The Hidden Polarities of Nature

by Margaret K. Chaney


CHAPTER 9:  Polarity Mysteries

What has troubled me most from the start of my discoveries is the question of what exactly is going on here.  Knowing that some of us are native to one domain of the planet and some to another would be less disturbing if we could understand this as some part of a clear global design.

Therefore, I set out to test Earth's environmental materials with as few variables as possible.  I began with the elements of the periodic table and found it a bewildering experience.  I filled in squares of a periodic chart, seeking some kind of orderly arrangement but my entities hop-skipped around with no theme whatsoever.  Of twenty-three tested so far, only three -- oxygen, silicon, and potassium -- are common to both REDLIST and GREENLIST; the others split into the usual dichotomy.  Our bodies are composed of these elements which are replaced regularly.  The only explanation for two mutually exclusive reactions to the raw materials for this replacement is that they are somehow buffered in combination with other substances or transformed on absorption

I tested people with an old horseshoe magnet painted green on one half and red on the other.  GREENLIST people were strong holding the green, or north-seeking pole.  REDLIST people tested conversely. Not knowing what the magnet might have been through over the years, I bought a new one at a science museum to double check.  The results were the same: REDLIST people are magnetized to south-seeking poles and GREENLISTs, to north-seeking poles.  Then tests with fossils embedded in glacial rock showed a trilobite to be REDLIST and a cephalopod to be GREENLIST.

I even had an opportunity to examine skulls and other bones of remains being moved from a small military cemetery during construction.  Through the three-person test, I determined the 150-year old skeletons were divided, some REDLIST and some GREENLIST.  Their biotype was still encoded in their bones.

That this is truly an Order of Creation was confirmed when I found identical twins to consistently be one REDLIST and one GREENLIST in every one of the fifty-eight sets I tested.  As mentioned above, everyone concentrates on how much identical twins look alike and how psychically in tune they are.  They overlook the differences in their metabolic patterns and in other physiological indicators.  Polarity seems to be intrinsic to our world.  Instead of a simple bipolar partition of male and female, we form a quadripolar design of REDLIST male, REDLIST female, GREENLIST male and GREENLIST female.

There are other mundane oddities, too.  GREENLIST includes green olives and olive oil; REDLIST, black olives; yet black olives are pressed to produce olive oil.  REDLIST counts pumpkins, GREENLIST gets pumpkin seeds.  REDLIST claims oysters, GREENLIST, pearls.  REDLIST owns sugar cane, GREENLIST takes the rum made from it.

If single foods can be baffling, combinations are even more so.  It seems that in certain mixtures of foods, separate ingredients neutralize one another sufficiently for everyone to be able to eat them.  Culturally, that is the way we have always functioned.  We serve REDLIST/GREENLIST melanges such as macaroni and cheese, lamb and mint jelly, pretzels and beer, fish and chips, strawberries and shortcake.

Then there's lasagna, composed of REDLIST tomatoes, REDLIST hamburger, GREENLIST cheeses and GREENLIST noodles, thereby registering "no" for everyone.  If we use less meat, more cheese, and substitute Italian plum tomatoes for regular red tomatoes, lasagna remains a "no" for REDLISTs but now becomes a "yes" for GREENLISTs.  Or, if we increase the amount of hamburger, add sausage, switch to cottage cheese and Monterey Jack and retain the standard tomatoes, we can transform the same basic recipe to a REDLIST dish.

This raises the issue of what mechanism operates when foods are combined.  Do some combinations simply mask negative signals of their inimical ingredients?  Or does a total chemical transformation take place?  Frances Moore Lappe, in Diet for a Small Planet, describes how, remarkably, legumes, grains, seeds, and nuts that lack certain essential amino acids necessary to provide whole protein become complete protein when eaten in the right combinations.

Two items on her list that supply each other's missing amino acids are peanuts and rice.  But peanuts are REDLIST and rice is GREENLIST.  Would the combination then be on both lists?  In fact, it turns out, it is on neither.  First I tested a mixed handful of dry peanuts and dry rice.  When that tested ''no" for both types, I added water, heated the mixture, and put it through the blender.  The resultant mush was still a "no" for both forms.  The mixture might have become a chemical protein, but apparently not a biological one.

REDLIST peanuts, however, mixed with REDLIST sunflower seeds become a complete protein for REDLIST people, while GREENLIST rice and GREENLIST sesame seeds comprise a complete protein for GREENLIST people.  Thankfully, our body's subconscious detection faculties usually can evaluate combinations as well as separate ingredients.

We have yet to address the role of mind in these two patterns.  Psychologists have determined that some people, allergic to flowers, will sneeze around artificial flowers if they believe them to be real.  Also, traditional medicine has documented instances of people ingesting known poisons and yet, through the power of rigorously disciplined minds, remaining unharmed.  Recent research has shown convincingly presented placebos can be as much as 60% as effective as the medicine they imitate.  In view of the large tolerance we already have for each other's environments, it is not unreasonable to wonder whether a practiced mind could entrain itself to the opposite pattern.  Yet people, adept in many forms of mind control still go about in bodies that give off typical "yes" and "no" signals.  Regardless of their metaphysics, their corporeal incarnations register the same REDLIST and GREENLIST indicators as everyone else.

Another supposition arose from the Fur and Jewel list I compiled, initially as a joke for some of my friends.  It was just before Christmas and I wanted to help them with their gift "hinting."  Rubies, amethysts and sapphires proved to be REDLIST; diamonds, topaz, and emeralds tested GREENLIST.  Gradually I realized many of the jewels on the lists were crystals.  When I think of crystals, I am reminded of radio frequencies.  Could it be our brains are "wired" with two different kinds of circuits, delivering opposite responses to the environment?  And knowing salt to be REDLIST and not GREENLIST, would the salt-sensitive gene the American Heart Association identified during blood pressure research be our gateway into the DNA?

After testing many, many people for food tolerances, I began to be able to predict in advance if they were going to reject an item.  I could not foretell when they were going to accept, only when they were going to reject.  I considered the possibility I could be influencing the result by anticipation, or might be biased in some other way.  Since this is a major danger in experimental work, I analyzed the signals accompanying my premonitions.

I began to notice a swoosh of air go over my shoulder as a subject's body rejected the item.  Closer observation revealed the air between us seemed to vibrate during the test.  The most precise description of what I felt would be a phenomenon analogous to something hitting me in the chest -- like tiny droplets of a sneeze.  It was as though the person's biofield stiffened, setting up a shield as something inimical approached, a shield so real I felt it.

A thirteen-year old boy questioned me about it. I stood about two feet in front of him and told him I would pick up something negative for me.  He became very still, then grinned from ear to ear.  He said, "It felt like little rays went into me."  I demonstrated it for a grown man.  I had closed my eyes.  As I opened them, I thought it might not have worked because his friends were laughing -- at him, staggering backward as though he had been pushed in the chest.

I do not know what form this shield takes.  It is feasible it is a permanent envelope of energy that bubbles out intact to ward off danger.  But if it is composed of units of energy that surge out to do battle with perceived danger, then dissipate, that is a more disturbing prospect.  How many times can we afford to lose our energy as we attempt to deal with an hostile environment?  And how much energy could we conserve if we learned to remain more in our own spheres?

I keep searching for historical evidence of some awareness of the two biological families.  How could it have remained unnoticed?  Yet I have not found even veiled references in Native American legends, Greek or Roman mythology, old writings from the mid-East, India, China -- nor in any literature from fairy tales of diverse lands to the most contemporary technical anthropological classifications.

Commonly, when I ask if someone knows of any such systematization of human duality, the yin and yang distinctions are mentioned.  The concept of yin and yang implies a blending in wholeness, primarily between the sexes, but it veers off into dogma and is much too vague to predict the specific responses of groups of people to particular environmental substances patently disclosed by muscle-function testing.  What could be the purpose of two kingdoms?  Early in my research a friend refused to believe there could be two domains.  She said, "God would not do that."  We know now, 7,000 tests later, whoever designed the universe (or is it duo-verse?) both would do that and did do that!  

But why?  

I had established to my satisfaction the fact all foods, vitamins, spices, herbs, medicines, liquors, narcotics and all the other items around us divide into two separate configurations appropriate for two strains of people.  I saw two groups of people so different their skeletons, muscles and body mechanics were visually identifiable.

Gradually it came to me my context had been too small.  This polarity is not really about people, at least not primarily.  It is about the planet! As human beings, we already have our polarity: male and female.  Planet Earth has its own polarity and we are just caught up in it.  I became aware of it when a young friend told me she was going to have a series of scratch tests for allergies because she developed distressing symptoms whenever she mowed the lawn (Who doesn't?).  I suggested she go outdoors, bring in some grass and weeds and we would see what muscle-function testing revealed.  She came back with red fescue grass, yew, cedar, and milkweed.  She tested weak to the grass, as suspected, weak to the yew, and strong to the cedar and milkweed.

That was when I first realized nonfood substances were as bipolar as the foods in the supermarket.  I enlisted several people from both lists and tested them.  The results disclosed vegetation fell into the REDLIST and GREENLIST divisions as clearly as the tested foods on the grocery store shelves.

The following week I vacationed in northern Michigan.  As I walked along the back roads and beside the lake, I tested grasses, weeds, wildflowers, trees, shells, rocks and feathers.  Everything fell into one or the other class.  Only edible mushrooms occurred on both lists, and only poison ivy and poison mushrooms appeared on neither.  Growing together in a square foot of soil were many plants, half of one sort and half the other.  

Family members have brought me back things as foreign as a handful of gravel from inside the Arctic Circle in Finland.  Ten stones, five GREENLIST (though only two of them looked alike), and the other five REDLIST.  The sand from Sleeping Bear dune in Michigan is GREENLIST.  The sand in the picnic area of the Desert Museum at Tucson, Arizona is REDLIST.  It is astonishing how the planet can be so consistent in dividing its environmental substances into these two categories.  

I came to the realization of what an intimate role the planet plays in the lives of human beings.  Some of us are made of the dust of one half and the rest made of the dust of the other half of the two interlocking halves of the planet.  Our planet stockpiles its resources in myriad diverse forms such as mountains and oceans, but the number of assets marked "miscellaneous" is so slight as to be almost insignificant.

As the human race moves forward with one lot called male and the other called female, the planet moves forward with a similar dynamic.  In alternating polarity, the REDLIST array interacts with the GREENLIST array.  This is the sex life of planet Earth!
















Polarities of 
Planet Earth






The Lists



Polarities of
Body and Spirit




Polarities of
Daily Life












Order the Book




Links Page



E-Mail Margaret

Order the Book




Copyright 2005 Margaret K. Chaney